United Statesv.Juarez-Hernandez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISIONDec 19, 2011
No. CR 11-0274 WHA (N.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2011)

No. CR 11-0274 WHA

12-19-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JONATHAN JUAREZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant.

MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630) Chief, Criminal Division PATRICIA SPALETTA (CABN 156788) Special Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 Attorneys for Plaintiff


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)


United States Attorney


MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)


Chief, Criminal Division


PATRICIA SPALETTA (CABN 156788)


Special Assistant United States Attorney


450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055


San Francisco, California 94102


Attorneys for Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the undersigned submits this proposed preliminary order of forfeiture.

On October 17, 2011, defendant Jonathan Juarez-Hernandez pled guilty to the following five counts of the Superseding Indictment: Counts Two and Four, Production of False Identification Documents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(1); Counts Three and Five, Transfer of False Identification Documents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(2); and Count Six, Possession of a Document Making Implement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(5). The Superseding Indictment contains a forfeiture allegation. The parties agree that the defendant agrees to forfeit all contraband seized by law enforcement in this case from his possession or control, including but not limited to, the computers, paper cutter, laminator, false identification documents, cell phones, computer diskettes, computer hardware, and printers. The parties agree that these items are specifically contained in Attachment A of this Order.

Accordingly, the Court has determined, based upon the defendant's guilty plea to Counts Two through Six, that all property named in Attachment A of this Order is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 982(a)(2)(B), and 1028(b)(5), that the defendant had an interest in such property, and that the government has established the requisite nexus between such property and the offenses.

MELINDA HAAG


United States Attorney


_______________


PATRICIA SPALETTA


Special Assistant United States Attorney


_______________


GEORGE BOISSEAU


Counsel for Defendant


SO ORDERED.

William Alsup


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE