From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Jacobo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Jan 17, 2012
Case No. 4:09CR3121 (D. Neb. Jan. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 4:09CR3121

01-17-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HUMBERTO JACOBO, Defendant.


TENTATIVE FINDINGS

I am in receipt of the revised presentence investigation report and addendum and the defendant's objection and motion for variance in this case.

IT IS ORDERED that:

(1) The undersigned will consult and follow the Guidelines to the extent permitted and required by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220(2005) and subsequent cases. See, e.g., Gall v. U.S., --- S.Ct. ----, 2007 WL 4292116 (2007). In this regard, the undersigned gives notice that, unless otherwise ordered, he will (a) give the advisory Guidelines such weight as they deserve within the context of each individual case and will filter the Guidelines' general advice through §3553(a)'s list of factors; (b) resolve all factual disputes relevant to sentencing by the greater weight of the evidence and without the aid of a jury; (c) impose upon the government the burden of proof on all Guideline-enhancements; (d) impose upon the defendant the burden of proof on all Guideline-mitigators; (e) depart from the advisory Guidelines, if appropriate, using pre-Booker departure theory; and (f) in cases where a departure using pre-Booker departure theory is not warranted, deviate or vary from the Guidelines when there is a principled reason which justifies a sentence different than that called for by application of the advisory Guidelines.

However, I will no longer give the Guidelines "substantial weight."

See note 1.
--------

(2) The defendant's objection regarding 9-level enhancement and motion for variance (filings 32 and 34) will be resolved at sentencing.

(3) Except to the extent (if at all) that I have sustained an objection or granted a motion or reserved an issue for later resolution in the preceding paragraph, the parties are herewith notified that my tentative findings are that the presentence report is correct in all respects.

(4) If any party wishes to challenge these tentative findings, said party shall, as soon as possible, but in any event at least five (5) business days before sentencing, file in the court file and serve upon opposing counsel and the court a motion challenging these tentative findings, supported by (a) such evidentiary materials as are required (giving due regard to the requirements of the local rules of practice respecting the submission of evidentiary materials), (b) a brief as to the law and (c) if an evidentiary hearing is requested, a statement describing why an evidentiary hearing is necessary and how long such a hearing would take.

(5) Absent submission of the information required by the preceding paragraph of this order, my tentative findings may become final and the presentence report may be adopted and relied upon by me without more.

(6) Unless otherwise ordered, any motion challenging these tentative findings shall be resolved at sentencing.

BY THE COURT:

Richard G. Kopf

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Jacobo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Jan 17, 2012
Case No. 4:09CR3121 (D. Neb. Jan. 17, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Jacobo

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HUMBERTO JACOBO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Date published: Jan 17, 2012

Citations

Case No. 4:09CR3121 (D. Neb. Jan. 17, 2012)