From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hollin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Feb 26, 2019
Case No. 1:19-cr-00020 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 26, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 1:19-cr-00020

02-26-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANDRE MAURICE HOLLIN, Defendant.


Hon. Janet T. Neff REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to W.D.Mich. LCrR. 11.1, I conducted a plea hearing in the captioned case on February 26, 2019, after receiving the written consent of defendant and all counsel. At the hearing, defendant Andre Maurice Hollin entered a plea of guilty to the One-Count Indictment in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement. In the One-Count Indictment, defendant is charged with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)(viii). On the basis of the record made at the hearing, I find that defendant is fully capable and competent to enter an informed plea; that the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived by defendant; that it is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises, apart from the promises in the plea agreement; that the defendant understands the nature of the charge and penalties provided by law; and that the plea has a sufficient basis in fact.

I therefore recommend that defendant's plea of guilty to the One-Count Indictment be accepted, that the court adjudicate defendant guilty, and that the written plea agreement be considered for acceptance at the time of sentencing. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt, acceptance of the plea agreement, and imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the district judge. Dated: February 26, 2019

/s/ Ellen S. Carmody

ELLEN S. CARMODY

U.S. Magistrate Judge

OBJECTIONS to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court within 14 days of the date of service of this notice. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).


Summaries of

United States v. Hollin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Feb 26, 2019
Case No. 1:19-cr-00020 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 26, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Hollin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANDRE MAURICE HOLLIN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Date published: Feb 26, 2019

Citations

Case No. 1:19-cr-00020 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 26, 2019)