United States
v.
Hamilton

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUITApr 25, 2016
No. 15-7822 (4th Cir. 2016)
No. 15-7822646 Fed. Appx. 326

No. 15-7822

04-25-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOHN HAMILTON, a/k/a Majestick, Defendant - Appellant.

John P. Hamilton, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call, John J. Frail, Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, West Virginia; John Lanier File, Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia; John Castle Parr, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:95-cr-00174-1) Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John P. Hamilton, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call, John J. Frail, Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charleston, West Virginia; John Lanier File, Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia; John Castle Parr, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John Hamilton appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hamilton, No. 1:95-cr-00174-1 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 6, 2015). We deny Hamilton's motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED