From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hadsell

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 26, 2017
No. 16-4767 (4th Cir. Jun. 26, 2017)

Summary

vacating and remanding a defendant's sentence because a prior Virginia burglary conviction had been used to support an enhanced ACCA sentence and noting that a "Virginia statutory burglary conviction does not qualify as the ACCA-enumerated offense of 'burglary'"

Summary of this case from Robinson v. United States

Opinion

No. 16-4767

06-26-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WESLEY PAUL HADSELL, Defendant - Appellant.

Jason A. Dunn, JASON A. DUNN, PLC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, Andrew Bosse, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:15-cr-00116-AWA-RJK-1) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jason A. Dunn, JASON A. DUNN, PLC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, Andrew Bosse, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to a written plea agreement, Wesley Paul Hadsell pled guilty to possession of ammunition by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2012). Prior to sentencing, Hadsell objected to the probation officer's recommendation that he be sentenced as an armed career criminal based, in part, on his prior Virginia conviction for statutory burglary. The district court acknowledged that Virginia statutory burglary is broader on its face than generic burglary as defined by the Supreme Court in Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 602 (1990). However, the district court determined that the statute at issue was divisible and applied the modified categorical approach to conclude that the elements of generic burglary were proven in Hadsell's case. Accordingly, the district court found that Hadsell's Virginia conviction for statutory burglary constituted a "violent felony" and was a proper predicate conviction under the Armed Career Criminal Act ("ACCA"), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (2012). The district court sentenced Hadsell to serve a term of 240 months' imprisonment.

On appeal, Hadsell challenges only the district court's determination that his Virginia conviction qualifies as an enumerated "violent felony" under the ACCA. Hadsell preserved this issue in the district court and, therefore, "we review de novo the question whether his prior state conviction[] qualified as [a] predicate felony conviction[] for purposes of a federal sentence enhancement." United States v. Gardner, 823 F.3d 793, 801 (4th Cir. 2016) (internal quotation marks omitted).

We recently decided, subsequent to the district court's ruling, first, that the Virginia burglary statute at issue here is indivisible and, therefore, not subject to application of the modified categorical approach, and second, that under the categorical approach, the statute is broader than the generic offense of burglary. See Castendet-Lewis v. Sessions, 855 F.3d 253, 261-64 (4th Cir. 2017). In light of that decision, we conclude that Hadsell's prior Virginia statutory burglary conviction does not qualify as the ACCA-enumerated offense of "burglary." Accordingly, we vacate Hadsell's sentence and remand the matter to the district court for resentencing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED


Summaries of

United States v. Hadsell

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 26, 2017
No. 16-4767 (4th Cir. Jun. 26, 2017)

vacating and remanding a defendant's sentence because a prior Virginia burglary conviction had been used to support an enhanced ACCA sentence and noting that a "Virginia statutory burglary conviction does not qualify as the ACCA-enumerated offense of 'burglary'"

Summary of this case from Robinson v. United States

vacating and remanding a defendant's sentence because a prior Virginia burglary conviction had been used to support an enhanced ACCA sentence and noting that a "Virginia statutory burglary conviction does not qualify as the ACCA-enumerated offense of 'burglary'"

Summary of this case from Pannell v. United States

vacating and remanding a defendant's sentence because a prior Virginia burglary conviction had been used to support an enhanced ACCA sentence and noting that a "Virginia statutory burglary conviction does not qualify as the ACCA-enumerated offense of 'burglary'"

Summary of this case from United States v. Hager

vacating and remanding a defendant's sentence because a prior Virginia burglary conviction had been used to support an enhanced ACCA sentence and noting that a "Virginia statutory burglary conviction does not qualify as the ACCA-enumerated offense of 'burglary'"

Summary of this case from Blackwell v. United States
Case details for

United States v. Hadsell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WESLEY PAUL HADSELL…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 26, 2017

Citations

No. 16-4767 (4th Cir. Jun. 26, 2017)

Citing Cases

United States v. Morrison

United States v. Stitt, No. 14-6158, 2017 WL 2766326, *7 (6th Cir. June 27, 2017). In addition, the Fourth…

United States v. McConatha

Since the filing of Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth…