United States
v.
Gamboa-Meza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIASep 5, 2012
CASE NO. 2:12-CR-00287-MCE (E.D. Cal. Sep. 5, 2012)

CASE NO. 2:12-CR-00287-MCE

09-05-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. JESUS GAMBOA-MEZA Defendant.

BENJAMIN WAGNER U.S. Attorney JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney


NICHOLAS F. REYES, #102114


LAW OFFICE OF NICHOLAS F. REYES


Attorney for Defendant


JESUS GAMBOA-MEZA


STIPULATION AND ORDER

Defendant, JESUS GAMBOA-MEZA, by and through counsel Nicholas F. Reyes, and the United States, by and through its attorney Assistant U.S. Attorney Jason Hitt, hereby stipulate and request that the Court continue the Status Conference in the above-captioned case from August 30, 2012 to September 27, 2012 at 9:00a.m. before the Honorable Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.

The parties stipulate and request that the Court exclude time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act from the date of this stipulation, August 30, 2012 through, and including September 27, 2012, for continuity of counsel under 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T4.

Respectfully Submitted,

______________________


NICHOLAS F. REYES, ESQ.


Attorney for Defendant


JESUS GAMBOA-MEZA


BENJAMIN WAGNER


U.S. Attorney


______________________


JASON HITT


Assistant U.S. Attorney


ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. It is ordered that the previously set Status Conference is continued to September 27, 2012 at 9:00a.m. It is further ordered that time from the date of the parties' stipulation, August 30, 2012, until and including September 27, 2012, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act to allow defendant to retain defense counsel and allow defendant continuity of counsel, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T4. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________


MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE