United States
v.
Fajardo-Guevara

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANAApr 30, 2014
CRIMINAL ACTION NO.: 3:10-cr-00151-BAJ-SCR (M.D. La. Apr. 30, 2014)

CRIMINAL ACTION NO.: 3:10-cr-00151-BAJ-SCR

04-30-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PATRICIA FAJARDO-GUEVARA


RULING AND ORDER

Considering Petitioner's pro se MOTION (Doc. 97), requesting that the "court appoint [an] attorney to defendant's case to file write [sic] of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court," (id. at p. 1):

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion (Doc. 97) is DENIED AS MOOT because the 90-day period for filing a petition for review with the Supreme Court has since expired. See Madden v. Texas, 498 U.S. 1301, 1304 (1991).

The record reflects that Petitioner was represented by counsel at the time she filed her Motion. (See Doc. 84; Doc. 85; Doc. 86). Petitioner's Motion offers no explanation for why her retained counsel was unable to file a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court. (See generally Doc. 97).

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 30th day of April, 2014.

________________


BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA