United Statesv.Esquivel-Mendez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIAOct 15, 2012
CASE NO. Cr 1:07-cr-0058 LJO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2012)

CASE NO. Cr 1:07-cr-0058 LJO

10-15-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE ESQUIVEL-MENDEZ, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KAREN A. ESCOBAR Assistant United States Attorney KATHLEEN PAGE Counsel for Defendant


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
KAREN A. ESCOBAR
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Plaintiff
United States of America


STIPULATION REGARDING

CONTINUANCE; [PROPOSED]

FINDINGS AND ORDER


STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. On May 10, 2012, Defendant filed a Section 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his conviction.
2. On May 18, 2012, Kathleen Page was appointed to represent Defendant.
3. On June 17, 2012, Defendant moved to continue the filing of his Section 2255 motion and the motion was granted.
4. On August 10, 2012, Defendant moved for a second continuance to file his motion and the motion was granted. At that time, the Court ordered the government to file its response five weeks after the service of Defendant's motion but no later than October
22.
5. The government requests 45 additional days to file its response on or before December 6.
6. The continuance is required to accommodate the work load of counsel for the United States, which includes travel to the Ninth Circuit for oral argument on October 15 in the matter of United States v. Eustorgio Flores, CA No. 10-10398.
7. Counsel for Defendant does not oppose the continuance.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER


United States Attorney


____________________


KAREN A. ESCOBAR


Assistant United States Attorney


___________________


KATHLEEN PAGE


Counsel for Defendant


ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE