United States
v.
Escamilla

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIASep 27, 2012
CASE NO. 1:12-CR-00205 SKO (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2012)

CASE NO. 1:12-CR-00205 SKO

09-27-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RICARDO ESCAMILLA, Defendant.

LAUREL MONTOYA Assistant United States Attorney This was agreed to by Ms. Montoya via telephone on September 27, 2012 ROGER K. LITMAN Attorney for Defendant RICARDO ESCAMILLA


ROGER K. LITMAN, 57634


Attorney at Law


Civic Center Square


Attorney for Defendant, RICARDO ESCAMILLA

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE

STATUS CONFERENCE

The parties hereto, by and through their respective attorneys, stipulate and agree that the status conference in this matter, currently calendared for October 1, 2012, be continued to October 15, 2012 at 1:00 p.m.

This continuance is necessitated as defense counsel has been assigned to trial in People v. Margarito Sanchez, Fresno County Superior Court Case Number F12900775, and is anticipated to last for one week.

The parties also agree that any delay resulting from this continuance shall be excluded in the interest of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§3161(h)(1)(F), 3161(h)(8)(A) and 3161(h)(8)(B)(I).

______________________


LAUREL MONTOYA


Assistant United States Attorney


This was agreed to by Ms. Montoya


via telephone on September 27, 2012


______________________


ROGER K. LITMAN


Attorney for Defendant


RICARDO ESCAMILLA


ORDER

The parties' request for a continuance of the status conference is GRANTED. The parties are cautioned that any further request for an extension of time must be supported by good cause and shall include a detailed explanation demonstrating due diligence, including a description of what actions have been undertaken, and what further actions are needed, to move the case forward. Counsel's calendar conflict alone does not constitute good cause. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto


UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE