United States
De Smet

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth CircuitApr 11, 1972
456 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1972)

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • United States v. Strayhorn

    …Our disposition of this issue makes it unnecessary for us to consider the merits, or even the availability of…

lock 1 Citing casekeyboard_arrow_right

No. 71-2811.

April 11, 1972.

Joel Shawn (argued), of Lukes Bassoni, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Stephen E. Clark (argued), of Athearn, Chandler, Hoffman, James L. Browning, Jr., U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Stanley A. Weigel, Judge.

Before CHAMBERS and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.

The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.

We decide here that if there was some irregularity in the "call" process, there is no evidence of prejudice to De Smet.

However, we reject the contention that there was irregularity in the "calling."

An alternative to Lexis that does not break the bank.

Casetext does more than Lexis for less than $65 per month.