From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Carter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Southern District of Indiana
Feb 13, 2012
Case No: 1:07CR00061-003 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Case No: 1:07CR00061-003 USM No: 08611-028

02-13-2012

United States of America v. Cory Carter


Date of Original Judgment: 05/02/2008

Date of Previous Amended Judgment: ______

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any)

None

Defendant's Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of [√] the defendant [] the Director of the Bureau of Prisons [] the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

[√] DENIED. [] GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence ofimprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of ___ months is reduced to ___.

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated ______shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Effective Date: ______

Unless otherwise indicated, the effective date of this order shall be ten (10) days after order date.

(if different from order date)

____________

LARRY J. McKINNEY, JUDGE

United Stales District Court

Southern District of Indiana


Summaries of

United States v. Carter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Southern District of Indiana
Feb 13, 2012
Case No: 1:07CR00061-003 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 13, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Carter

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. Cory Carter

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Southern District of Indiana

Date published: Feb 13, 2012

Citations

Case No: 1:07CR00061-003 (S.D. Ind. Feb. 13, 2012)

Citing Cases

Rice v. Gong Lum

In Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537, the constitutionality of the Louisiana statute, requiring separate…

People, ex Rel. King, v. Gallagher

It would seem to be a plain deduction from the rule in that case that the privilege of receiving an education…