From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Carter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
Feb 12, 2020
Case No. 1:19-cr-23-MW-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 1:19-cr-23-MW-GRJ

02-12-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIE CHARLES CARTER, JR.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On this date, the Defendant, WILLIE CHARLES CARTER, JR., his attorney, and the attorney for the Government appeared before the undersigned for the purpose of considering Defendant's entry of a guilty plea to Counts One, Two, Three, and Four of the Superseding Indictment (ECF No. 55). Count One charges Defendant with conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, its salts, isomers, or salts of its isomers, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A)(viii), and 846. Count Two charges Defendant with possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, its salts, isomers, or salts of its isomers, cocaine base, Eutylone Hydrochloride (a salt of a positional isomer of Pentylone), and marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii), (b)(1)(C), and (b)(1)(D). Count Three charges Defendant with possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking crime (Count Two), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i). Count Four charges Defendant with possession of a firearm and ammunition by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e).

The district judge referred this matter to the undersigned for purposes of hearing Defendant's proposed plea pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, and to enter a report and recommendation as to whether to accept the plea. All parties consented to this procedure, and the written consent has been entered.

The Court addressed Defendant personally in open court, and after assuring that Defendant was competent to proceed and had consented to pleading guilty, the Court finds:

1. Defendant is mentally alert, appears to be reasonably intelligent, and understands the nature of the charges as to which the plea is offered and the consequences of a guilty plea.

2. Defendant understands that he has a right to trial by jury, to persist in his plea of not guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and that he has a right against compelled self-incrimination.

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence he faces if the guilty plea is accepted, including the effect of the supervised release term, and understands that the sentencing guidelines apply and that the court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances.

4. The plea of guilty by Defendant has been freely, knowingly, and voluntarily made and is not the result of force or threats or of any promises except for those promises contained in the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that his answers during the plea colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against him in a prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the district court. Defendant understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has made his decision to plead guilty with the advice and counsel of a competent attorney with whom Defendant acknowledged he was satisfied.

10. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with his plea of guilty before the undersigned. He understands that he has waived the ten- day period for filing objections to this report and recommendation, and he agrees that he has twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and recommendation in which to file written objections, if any. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the shorter period for objections.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the Court should ACCEPT Defendant's plea of guilty to Counts One, Two, Three, and Four of the Superseding Indictment.

IN CHAMBERS this 12th day of February 2020.

/s/_________

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within 24 hours after receiving a copy of this report and recommendation.


Summaries of

United States v. Carter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
Feb 12, 2020
Case No. 1:19-cr-23-MW-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Carter

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIE CHARLES CARTER, JR.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Feb 12, 2020

Citations

Case No. 1:19-cr-23-MW-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2020)