United Statesv.Bridges

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Western District of North CarolinaJan 12, 2012
Case No: DNCW307CR000061-009 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 12, 2012)

Case No: DNCW307CR000061-009 USM No: 21232-058

01-12-2012

United States of America v. Demario Bridges a/k/a(s): "Mario" & "Dunlap"

E. James Chandler II Defendant's Attorney


Date of Original Judgment: September 26, 2008


Date of Last Amended Judgment: N/A


E. James Chandler II


Defendant's Attorney


Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of [×] the defendant [ ] the Director of the Bureau of Prisons [ ] the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

[ ] DENIED. [×]GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of All counts: 98 months is reduced to All counts: 79 months I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Original Offense Level:¦29 ¦Amended Offense Level: ¦27 ¦ +-----------------------+--------------+-----------------------+--------------¦ ¦Criminal History ¦I ¦Criminal History ¦I ¦ ¦Category: ¦ ¦Category: ¦ ¦ +-----------------------+--------------+-----------------------+--------------¦ ¦Original Guideline ¦87 to 108 ¦Amended Guideline ¦70 to 87 ¦ ¦Range: ¦months ¦Range: ¦months ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

[×] The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range. [ ] The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range. [ ] The reduced sentence is above the amended guideline range. [×] Other (explain): The revised guideline range is below the statutory mandatory minimum as the defendant received the benefit of the safety valve.

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Upon release from imprisonment, and absent a residential plan accepted by the U.S. Probation Officer prior to release from incarceration, it is ordered that as a condition of supervised release the defendant shall submit to the local Residential Reentry Center for a period not to exceed 90 days, with work release, at the direction of the U.S. Probation Officer. Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated September 26, 2008, shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Effective Date: _


(if different from order date)


_____________


Frank D. Whitney


United States District Judge