From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Bell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Jan 29, 2020
Case No. 1:19-cr-00250 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 29, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 1:19-cr-00250

01-29-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MAURICE ANTHONY BELL, III, Defendant.


Hon. Janet T. Neff REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to W.D.Mich. LCrR. 11.1, I conducted a plea hearing in the captioned case on January 29, 2020, after receiving the written consent of defendant and all counsel. At the hearing, defendant Maurice Anthony Bell, III entered a plea of guilty to Count One of the Indictment in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement. In Count One of the Indictment, defendant is charged with being a felon in possession of firearms in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). On the basis of the record made at the hearing, I find that defendant is fully capable and competent to enter an informed plea; that the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived by defendant; that it is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises, apart from the promises in the plea agreement; that the defendant understands the nature of the charge and penalties provided by law; and that the plea has a sufficient basis in fact.

I therefore recommend that defendant's plea of guilty to Count One of the Indictment be accepted, that the court adjudicate defendant guilty, and that the written plea agreement be considered for acceptance at the time of sentencing. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt, acceptance of the plea agreement, and imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the district judge. Dated: January 29, 2020

/s/ Sally J. Berens

SALLY J. BERENS

U.S. Magistrate Judge

OBJECTIONS to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court within 14 days of the date of service of this notice. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).


Summaries of

United States v. Bell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Jan 29, 2020
Case No. 1:19-cr-00250 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 29, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MAURICE ANTHONY BELL, III,…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Date published: Jan 29, 2020

Citations

Case No. 1:19-cr-00250 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 29, 2020)