United States
v.
Bannister

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISIONJun 13, 2012
C/R NO. 3:02-548-CMC (D.S.C. Jun. 13, 2012)

C/R NO. 3:02-548-CMC

06-13-2012

United States of America, v. Tanesha Bannister, Defendant.


OPINION and ORDER

This matter is before the court on Defendant's motion for production of the transcript of the evidentiary hearing held April 12, 2012, at government expense. For the reasons stated below, Defendant's motion is granted.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 753(f), "[f]ees for transcripts furnished in proceedings brought under section 2255 . . . to persons permitted to . . . appeal in forma pauperis shall also be paid by the United States . . . if the trial judge or a circuit judge certifies that the appeal is not frivolous and that the transcript is needed to decide the issue presented by the suit or appeal."

The undersigned has denied a certificate of appealability and believes that Defendant's appeal is without merit. However, Defendant contends the transcript of the hearing is necessary "to properly litigate and present her request for a certificate of appealability [to the circuit court]." Mot. at 1 (ECF No. 3674). Because the court's ruling on Defendant's motion relating to ineffective assistance of counsel was made from the bench at the conclusion of the hearing and was based upon the testimony of Defendant and three witnesses presented by the Government, the court finds the transcript of the hearing should be transcribed and provided to Defendant at government expense.

Accordingly, Defendant's motion is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________


CAMERON McGOWAN CURRIE


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Columbia, South Carolina


June 13, 2012