From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Babers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 3, 2011
No. CR 11-0490-WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2011)

Opinion

No. CR 11-0490-WHA

10-03-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JABAR BABERS, Defendant.

MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630) Chief, Criminal Division RANDY S. LUSKEY (CABN 240915) Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff


MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)

United States Attorney

MIRANDA KANE (CABN 150630)

Chief, Criminal Division

RANDY S. LUSKEY (CABN 240915)

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Plaintiff

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING

TIME FROM SEPTEMBER 6, 2011 TO

SEPTEMBER 27, 2011

The defendant, JABAR BABERS, represented by Marc Axelbaum, Esquire, and the government, represented by Randy Luskey, Assistant United States Attorney, appeared before the Court on September 6, 2011 for a status hearing. Mr. Axelbaum informed the Court that he was finishing his review of the discovery in this matter and planned to file a suppression motion. The Court set the following briefing schedule on the defendant's anticipated motion: September 27, 2011 - Motion; October 11, 2011 - Opposition; October 18, 2011 - Reply; October 25, 2011 -Hearing.

Counsel requested that time be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act between September 6, 2011 because defense counsel needed that time to finalize his review of discovery and to conduct necessary investigation. The government had no objection to excluding time.

Based upon the representation of counsel and for good cause shown, the Court finds that failing to exclude the time between September 6, 2011 and September 27, 2011 would unreasonably deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the time between September 6, 2011 and September 27, 2011 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time between September 6, 2011 and September 27, 2011 shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

William Alsup

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Babers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 3, 2011
No. CR 11-0490-WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Babers

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JABAR BABERS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 3, 2011

Citations

No. CR 11-0490-WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2011)