From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Anderson

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 3, 1988
860 F.2d 166 (5th Cir. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-2905.

November 3, 1988.

Thomas D. Moran, Stanley G. Schneider, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Paula C. Offenhauser, Frances H. Stacy, Don Degabrielle, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Ross N. Sterling, Judge.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.


ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion August 15, 1988, 5 Cir., 1988, 853 F.2d 313)


A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.


Summaries of

United States v. Anderson

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 3, 1988
860 F.2d 166 (5th Cir. 1988)
Case details for

United States v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JOE ALVIN ANDERSON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Nov 3, 1988

Citations

860 F.2d 166 (5th Cir. 1988)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Williams

Although bound by a prior decision to the contrary, one panel of the Fifth Circuit has recently expressed a…

U.S. v. Anderson

We granted rehearing en banc in order to reconsider our holding in Vasquez. 860 F.2d 166 (5th Cir. 1988). We…