From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Sun Oil Co.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania
Dec 10, 1954
16 F.R.D. 533 (E.D. Pa. 1954)

Opinion

         Action wherein defendant moved to require production of certain statements of plaintiff's witnesses prior to trial. The District Court, Ganey, J., held that where it appeared that sufficient information was presently available to defendant from which he could make additional answer or prepare for trial, his motion would be denied.

         Motion denied.

         See, also, D.C., 10 F.R.D. 448.

          W. Wilson White, U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., George W. Wise, David A. Fields, Anti-Trust Div., William T. Collins, Washington, D. C., Larry L. Williams, Anti-Trust Div., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

          Joseph W. Henderson (of Rawle & Henderson), John Blair Moffett (of Moffett, Frye & Leopold), Henry A. Frye, James Alan Montgomery, Jr., (of Pepper, Bodine, Frick, Scheetz & Hamilton), Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.


          GANEY, District Judge.

         This is a motion by the defendant to require production of certain statements of the plaintiff's witnesses prior to trial.

         After submission of briefs and arguments, it is determined that sufficient information is presently available to the defendant from which he can make additional answer or prepare for trial.

         While it may be that at the trial of the cause sufficient showing will be made which will require the production of the statements then, the defendant's motion to require their production now prior to trial is hereby denied.


Summaries of

United States v. Sun Oil Co.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania
Dec 10, 1954
16 F.R.D. 533 (E.D. Pa. 1954)
Case details for

United States v. Sun Oil Co.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America v. SUN OIL COMPANY.

Court:United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 10, 1954

Citations

16 F.R.D. 533 (E.D. Pa. 1954)

Citing Cases

United States v. Nobles

Compare United States v. McKay, 372 F.2d 174 (CA5 1967), with United States v. Brown, 478 F.2d 1038 (CA7…