From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Nozero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 27, 2012
2:11-CV-00190-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Feb. 27, 2012)

Opinion

2:11-CV-00190-PMP-PAL

02-27-2012

ANNETTE L. TURNER, Plaintiff, v. ELIZABETH NOZERO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Having read and considered Plaintiff's Motion for More Time (Doc. #24) filed February 22, 2012, and Defendants' Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. #25) filed February 23, 2012, and it appearing therefrom that Plaintiff has had exceptional extensions of time within which to retain counsel to represent her in this matter, and appears unable to do so, and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for More Time (Doc. #24) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have to and including March 12, 2012 within which to file her response in opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #21). Failure to do so will result in Court granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.

____________

PHILIP M. PRO

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Turner v. Nozero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 27, 2012
2:11-CV-00190-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Feb. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Turner v. Nozero

Case Details

Full title:ANNETTE L. TURNER, Plaintiff, v. ELIZABETH NOZERO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 27, 2012

Citations

2:11-CV-00190-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Feb. 27, 2012)