From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. Frank J. Beltramo, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 19, 1937
118 N.J.L. 301 (N.J. 1937)

Opinion

Argued October 27, 1936 —

Decided May 19, 1937.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 117 N.J.L. 72.

For the respondent, Isadore Rabinowitz.

For the appellant, Merritt Lane.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Tucker v. Frank J. Beltramo, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 19, 1937
118 N.J.L. 301 (N.J. 1937)
Case details for

Tucker v. Frank J. Beltramo, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN TUCKER, RESPONDENT, v. FRANK J. BELTRAMO, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 19, 1937

Citations

118 N.J.L. 301 (N.J. 1937)
192 A. 62

Citing Cases

Yeomans v. Jersey City

Hopler v. Hill City Coal Lumber Co., 5 N.J. 466 (1950). However, by the terms of N.J.S.A. 34:15-27, a prior…

United Advertising Corp. v. Borough of Raritan

In Tucker v. Beltramo, 117 N.J.L. 72 ( Sup. Ct. 1936), at the bottom of page 77, there was the following…