From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trujillo v. Valero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 7, 2017
Case No. 1:17-cv-00091-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 1:17-cv-00091-LJO-SAB

03-07-2017

JOSE TRUJILLO, Plaintiff, v. RITO VALERO, dba PARADISE VIDEO N MINI MART, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (ECF No. 7)

This action was filed on January 19, 2017. (ECF No. 1.) On March 6, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

"[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), 'a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.' " Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). The Ninth Circuit has held that Rule 41(a) allows a plaintiff to dismiss without a court order any defendant who has yet to serve an answer or motion for summary judgment. Pedrina v. Chun, 987 F.2d 608, 609 (9th Cir. 1993). "[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is required, the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can't complain, and the district court lacks jurisdiction to do anything about it." Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc., 193 F.3d at 1078. In this action, no defendant has filed an answer or other responsive pleading.

Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 7 , 2017

/s/_________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Trujillo v. Valero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 7, 2017
Case No. 1:17-cv-00091-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2017)
Case details for

Trujillo v. Valero

Case Details

Full title:JOSE TRUJILLO, Plaintiff, v. RITO VALERO, dba PARADISE VIDEO N MINI MART…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 7, 2017

Citations

Case No. 1:17-cv-00091-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2017)