From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trimboli v. Scarpaci Funeral Home, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 24, 1972
283 N.E.2d 614 (N.Y. 1972)

Summary

In Trimboli v Scarpaci Funeral Home (30 N.Y.2d 687, affg on opn below 37 A.D.2d 386), we answered one early question that arose in connection with the right of a defendant in a bifurcated trial to appeal from the interlocutory determination of liability and to obtain a stay pending that appeal, thereby delaying the assessment of damages.

Summary of this case from Love v. State of New York

Opinion

Argued March 13, 1972

Decided March 24, 1972

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, FRANK J. PINO, J.

Thomas Grimes and Daniel J. Coughlin for appellants.

Samuel J. Sussman and Jacob Miller for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division (see, also, Sullivan Cromwell v. Hudson Manhattan Corp., 29 N.Y.2d 523). Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.


Summaries of

Trimboli v. Scarpaci Funeral Home, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 24, 1972
283 N.E.2d 614 (N.Y. 1972)

In Trimboli v Scarpaci Funeral Home (30 N.Y.2d 687, affg on opn below 37 A.D.2d 386), we answered one early question that arose in connection with the right of a defendant in a bifurcated trial to appeal from the interlocutory determination of liability and to obtain a stay pending that appeal, thereby delaying the assessment of damages.

Summary of this case from Love v. State of New York
Case details for

Trimboli v. Scarpaci Funeral Home, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARIE TRIMBOLI et al., Respondents, v. SCARPACI FUNERAL HOME, INC. et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 24, 1972

Citations

283 N.E.2d 614 (N.Y. 1972)
283 N.E.2d 614
332 N.Y.S.2d 637

Citing Cases

Malkin v. Wright

July 18, 1978 Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on May 5, 1977, denying appellant's motion to…

Love v. State of New York

In so deciding, however, the court recited facts which showed that defendant in that case was the cause of…