From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Townsend v. Card

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 11, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0147 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0147 DFL GGH P.

September 11, 2006


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed July 7, 2006, the court granted plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. In the July 7th order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

For the reasons given in the July 7, 2006, order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order.


Summaries of

Townsend v. Card

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 11, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0147 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2006)
Case details for

Townsend v. Card

Case Details

Full title:REBIO TOWNSEND, Plaintiff, v. D. CARD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 11, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0147 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2006)