From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Dec 27, 2016
No. 04-16-00622-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 27, 2016)

Opinion

No. 04-16-00622-CR

12-27-2016

Antonio TORRES, Appellant v. The State of TEXAS, Appellee


From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2014CR0934
Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On December 16, 2016, appellant filed a pro se motion for extension of time in which to file his appellant's brief. Appellant is represented on appeal by Patrick Barry Montgomery. In Texas, appellants do not have the right to hybrid representation. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means appellant's pro se motion will be treated as presenting nothing for this court's consideration. Id.

Accordingly, the motion is DENIED, and appellant is encouraged to refrain from filing further pro se motions.

/s/_________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 27th day of December, 2016.

/s/_________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Torres v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Dec 27, 2016
No. 04-16-00622-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Torres v. State

Case Details

Full title:Antonio TORRES, Appellant v. The State of TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Dec 27, 2016

Citations

No. 04-16-00622-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 27, 2016)