From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. Rubalcaba

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 27, 2012
Case No. CV 11-10146-RSWL (C.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-10146-RSWL

07-27-2012

Rosa Torres v. Eduardo Rubalcaba et al

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Not Present Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable RONALD S.W. LEW, U.S. District Court Judge

Joseph Remigio

Deputy Clerk

Not Present

Court Reporter / Recorder

n/a

Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Not Present

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

This Order is issued pursuant to FRCP 4(m), which requires that plaintiff(s) serve the summons and complaint upon all defendants within 120 days after filing the complaint. The Court may dismiss the action prior to the 120 days, however, if plaintiff(s) has/have not diligently prosecuted the action.

It is the responsibility of plaintiff to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court, Local Rule 7-1.

The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than AUGUST 3, 2011, why this action should not be dismissed as to all defendants for lack of prosecution.

As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently.

Proof of service of the Summons and Complaint (electronically filed)

No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due.

___________ : 00

Initials of Preparer JRE


Summaries of

Torres v. Rubalcaba

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 27, 2012
Case No. CV 11-10146-RSWL (C.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Torres v. Rubalcaba

Case Details

Full title:Rosa Torres v. Eduardo Rubalcaba et al

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 27, 2012

Citations

Case No. CV 11-10146-RSWL (C.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)