From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. Pisano

U.S.
Dec 1, 1997
522 U.S. 997 (1997)

Summary

holding that "an adverse employment action . . . [sufficient to support a retaliation claim is] a materially adverse change in the terms and conditions of employment"

Summary of this case from Neratko v. Frank

Opinion

No. 97-578.

December 1, 1997


ORDERS

C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 116 F. 3d 625.


Summaries of

Torres v. Pisano

U.S.
Dec 1, 1997
522 U.S. 997 (1997)

holding that "an adverse employment action . . . [sufficient to support a retaliation claim is] a materially adverse change in the terms and conditions of employment"

Summary of this case from Neratko v. Frank

denying absolute immunity for prosecutor who swore out a false certificate of probable cause, thus crossing the line between advocacy and participation

Summary of this case from Davis v. Zirkelbach

noting that the same standards for evaluating hostile environment claims are the same whether the alleged discrimination is based on race or sex

Summary of this case from Young v. Rogers Wells

noting that "claims brought under New York State's Human Rights Law are analytically identical to claims brought under Title VII"

Summary of this case from Simmons v. New York City Health Hospital Corporation

noting that "claims brought under New York State's Human Rights Law are analytically identical to claims brought under Title VII"

Summary of this case from Rodriguez v. New York City Housing Authority
Case details for

Torres v. Pisano

Case Details

Full title:TORRES v. PISANO ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 1, 1997

Citations

522 U.S. 997 (1997)
118 S. Ct. 563

Citing Cases

Dyke v. McCleave

To prevail on her hostile work environment claim, Plaintiff must show: "(1) that the `workplace was permeated…

Nuri v. PRC, Inc.

However, the common law rule does not use `aided' is such a broad sense.");see also Torres v. Pisano, 116…