Submitted December 15, 2009.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed December 22, 2009.
Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Nancy E. Friedman, Esq., Paul Fiorino, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Frank P. Sprouls, Esq., Law Office of Ricci and Sprouls, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A077-194-060.
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Maria Esther Torres De Romo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") reinstatement of a prior order of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law and due process claims. Garcia de Rincon v. Dep't Homeland Security, 539 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review.
Torres De Romo's contention that the IJ erred in reinstating her removal order without determining her eligibility for adjustment of status fails because she was not eligible for an adjustment of status because she reentered the United States without permission after being removed. See Gonzales v. Dep't of Homeland Security, 508 F.3d 1227, 1242 (9th Cir. 2007) (abrogating Perez-Gonzalez v. Ashcroft, 379 F.3d 783 (9th Cir. 2004)).