From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Timson v. Young

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Dec 9, 1980
436 N.E.2d 538 (Ohio Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. 80AP-662

Decided December 9, 1980.

Civil procedure — Venue — Civ. R. 3 — Final orders — R. C. 2505.02 — Change of venue order is not a final appealable order.

1. Since a proceeding for a change of venue is not a special proceeding, and since a change of venue order does not determine the action, nor prevent a judgment, a change of venue order, pursuant to Civ. R. 3(C)(1), is not a final appealable order pursuant to R. C. 2505.02.

2. The issue of the propriety of a change of venue order is reviewable after a final judgment is entered in the case.

APPEAL: Court of Appeals for Franklin County.

Mr. John W. Timson, pro se. Messrs. Roderick, Myers Linton, Mr. Harry A. Tipping, Green, Schiavoni, Murphy, Haines Sgambati Co., L.P.A., and Mr. Robert W. Sauter, for appellees.


Defendants-appellees have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that it is not taken from a final appealable order.

Plaintiff-appellant, John W. Timson, purports to appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County transferring this action to the Court of Common Pleas of Summit County pursuant to Civ. R. 3(C)(1) upon the ground that venue is properly in that county (Summit County) pursuant to Civ. R. 3(B). A proceeding for a change of venue is not a special proceeding, Snell v. Cincinnati Street Ry. Co. (1899), 60 Ohio St. 256, appeal dismissed (1900), 179 U.S. 395; so, accordingly, to be appealable pursuant to R. C. 2505.02, the order must be one "* * * which in effect determines the action and prevents a judgment * * *."

Clearly, the change of venue order does not determine the action, nor prevent a judgment in plaintiff's favor upon the merits. The issue of the propriety of the change of venue will be reviewable after a final judgment is entered in the case.

Accordingly, the appeal herein is not from a final appealable order and vests no jurisdiction in this court to determine the issues raised — even if we were to find venue to be proper in Franklin County.

For these reasons, the motion to dismiss is sustained, and this appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

REILLY and McCORMAC, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Timson v. Young

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Dec 9, 1980
436 N.E.2d 538 (Ohio Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Timson v. Young

Case Details

Full title:TIMSON, APPELLANT, v. YOUNG, D.B.A. WESTERN RESERVE INDUSTRIAL SALES…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio

Date published: Dec 9, 1980

Citations

436 N.E.2d 538 (Ohio Ct. App. 1980)
436 N.E.2d 538

Citing Cases

Stavrou v. Cleveland

R.C. 2505.02. See General Electric Supply Co. v. Warden Electric, Inc. (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 378, 528 N.E.2d…

State v. Johnson

In addition, issues regarding a change of venue are not final appealable orders and can be reviewed after…