From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Colorado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 20, 2014
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03078-REB-CBS (D. Colo. Feb. 20, 2014)

Summary

rejecting Eighth Amendment claim where Plaintiff failed to identify any "actual threats or harm"

Summary of this case from Hinojosa v. Fustini

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-03078-REB-CBS

02-20-2014

DEMETRIUS THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF COLORADO, CDOC, TOM CLEMENTS, SUSAN JONES, SGT. JOHNSON, and MR. K, Defendants.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Blackburn, J.

This matter is before me on the following:(1) the Motion to Dismiss [#32] filed May 13, 2013; and (2) the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#54] filed January 27, 2014. I approve and adopt the recommendation and grant the motion to dismiss.

"[#32]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

No objections to the recommendation were filed. Thus, I review it only for plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005). Finding no error, much less plain error, in the recommendation of the magistrate judge, I find and conclude that the recommendation should be approved and adopted as an order of this court.

The plaintiff is proceeding pro se. Thus, I have construed his pleadings and other filings more liberally and held them to a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007); Andrews v. Heaton, 483 F.3d 1070, 1076 (10th Cir. 2007); Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991).

The plaintiff, Demetrius Thomas, is an inmate in the custody of the Colorado Department of Corrections. In Claim One, Mr. Thomas alleges that the defendants failed to protect him and denied him equal protection of the law while Mr. Thomas was housed at the Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility. Based on these allegations, he asserts claims under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Complaint [#13]. In Claim Two, Mr. Thomas asserts that defendant Sgt. Johnson retaliated against Mr. Thomas, in violation of his First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments, by labeling Mr. Thomas a "rat." Id.

Based on a thorough analysis of the complaint and the issues raised in the motion to dismiss, the magistrate judge recommends that the motion to dismiss be granted and that this case be dismissed. I concur. Therefore, I approve and adopt the recommendation and grant the motion to dismiss.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#54] filed January 27, 2014, is APPROVED and ADOPTED as an order of this court;

2. That under FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6), the Motion to Dismiss [#32] filed May 13, 2013, is GRANTED;

3. That this case is DISMISSED;

4. That JUDGMENT SHALL ENTER in favor of the defendants, State of Colorado, CDOC, Tom Clements, Susan Jones, Sgt. Johnson, and Mr. K, against the plaintiff, Demetrius Thomas; and

5. That the defendants are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the clerk of the court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.

Dated February 20, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

__________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Thomas v. Colorado

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 20, 2014
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03078-REB-CBS (D. Colo. Feb. 20, 2014)

rejecting Eighth Amendment claim where Plaintiff failed to identify any "actual threats or harm"

Summary of this case from Hinojosa v. Fustini
Case details for

Thomas v. Colorado

Case Details

Full title:DEMETRIUS THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF COLORADO, CDOC, TOM CLEMENTS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 20, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-03078-REB-CBS (D. Colo. Feb. 20, 2014)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Daniels

nother inmate does not satisfy the objective component of an Eighth Amendment violation. See, e.g., Grimsley…

Hinojosa v. Fustini

Id. Plaintiffs do not allege any specific incidents of assault, or indicate that the details of any specific…