From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Velox

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 3, 1940
36 F. Supp. 929 (S.D.N.Y. 1940)

Summary

In Great A. & P. Tea Co. v. S. S. Velox, D.C., 36 F.Supp. 929; American Mfg. Co. v. Exermont, D.C., 1 F.R.D. 574; Christiansen v. Reading Co., D.C., 35 F.Supp. 522, these rules are held to be alike in effect.

Summary of this case from American S.S. Co. v. Buckeye S.S. Co.

Opinion

December 3, 1940.

Hill, Rivkins Middleton, of New York City (Barton P. Ferris, of New York City, of counsel), for libelants.

Haight, Griffin, Deming Gardner, of New York City (J. Ward O'Neill, of New York City, of counsel), for respondents.


Libel by the Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Company against S.S. Velox, etc., and the Sprague Steamship Agency, Incorporated, and another; and another libel by the Continental Insurance Company, Incorporated, and the Skins Trading Corporation against the S.S. Karen Thorden, et cetera, and Rederi A/B Stears, Gustaf B. Thorden, manager, both for damage to cargoes, wherein the respondents propounded interrogatories annexed to their answers and the libelants excepted to such interrogatories.

Interrogatories overruled in part and sustained in part.


The problem here is the scope and construction of Admiralty Rule 31, as amended by the Supreme Court of the United States, in effect September 1, 1939, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723, when applied to cargo-damage cases.

The issues arise by exceptions taken by the libellants to certain of the interrogatories annexed to the answers of the respondents.

The libels allege delivery of the cargo in good condition, and discharge in a seriously damaged condition, and impaired in value, all in violation of respondents' and ships' obligations and duties as common carriers of merchandise by water for hire.

The libels do not allege negligence on the part of the carriers.

The answers, among other defenses, set up that the goods were shipped under bills-of-lading, and that if the goods were damaged, the injuries did not occur while in carriers' possession, but before delivery to the vessel, or from inherent vice, or other causes not attributable to respondents and claimants.

The cargo in the S.S. Velox case was coffee beans, and the damage claimed is that of seawater. In the S.S. Karen Thorden case the cargo was raw hareskins, and the damage claimed is that caused by sweating of the vessel's hold.

Being in accord with the view expressed by Judge Mandelbaum in the S.S. Exermont case, D.C.S.D. of N.Y., 1 F.R.D. 574, decided September 26, 1940, and by Judge Moscowitz in the Steamtug Bern case, The Christina, D.C.E.D. of N.Y., 35 F. Supp. 522, regarding the construction and scope of new Admiralty Rule 31, I shall follow these decisions, including that portion dealing with interrogatories directed of the question of damages, Fox v. House, D.C., 29 F. Supp. 673.

Admiralty Rule 31 is identical with Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, and was adopted subsequent thereto, and I think it should be given the same construction. It is true that Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 81(a)(1) provides that "These rules do not apply to proceedings in admiralty", but I think this does not mean that they shall or must not apply. That sentence was included in the new rules merely as a recognition of the lack of power in the Rules Committee to promulgate rules for procedure in admiralty under the Act, 48 Stat. 1064, 28 U.S.C.A. § 723b and § 723c.


Summaries of

The Velox

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 3, 1940
36 F. Supp. 929 (S.D.N.Y. 1940)

In Great A. & P. Tea Co. v. S. S. Velox, D.C., 36 F.Supp. 929; American Mfg. Co. v. Exermont, D.C., 1 F.R.D. 574; Christiansen v. Reading Co., D.C., 35 F.Supp. 522, these rules are held to be alike in effect.

Summary of this case from American S.S. Co. v. Buckeye S.S. Co.
Case details for

The Velox

Case Details

Full title:THE VELOX. GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC TEA CO. v. THE VELOX et al. THE KAREN…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 3, 1940

Citations

36 F. Supp. 929 (S.D.N.Y. 1940)

Citing Cases

The Zarembo

It is alleged with particularity that the damage caused was due to the perils of the sea.           There is…

The Raphael Semmes

I have held (American Mfg. Co. v. Exermont, D.C., 1 F.R.D. 574) and the more recent opinions in this circuit…