From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 18, 2001
789 So. 2d 523 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 3D00-1475

Opinion filed July 18, 2001.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Amy Dean, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 98-38777.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Richard L. Polin Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and LEVY, JJ.


The defendant's sole point on this appeal challenges the admission of a written "prior consistent statement" made by his alleged co-perpetrator who testified against him at the trial. There is no merit to this claim because (a) the statement was properly admitted to rebut the argument that the accomplice's testimony was fabricated only after he had plead guilty himself, see Moore v. State, 701 So.2d 545 (Fla. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1083 (1998); (b) the defendant's objection below was not based on the legal ground asserted on appeal, Thomas v. State, 645 So.2d 185 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); and (c) the admission of the written statement was plainly cumulative and thus harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Goodwin v. State, 751 So.2d 537 (Fla. 1999); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986); Moss v. State, 664 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), review denied, 675 So.2d 928 (Fla. 1996).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Taylor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 18, 2001
789 So. 2d 523 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Taylor v. State

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY TAYLOR, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 18, 2001

Citations

789 So. 2d 523 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)