Tall
v.
P'ship Dev. Grp. Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUITOct 20, 2016
No. 16-1532 (4th Cir. Oct. 20, 2016)

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • Hancock. v. Sullivan

    …1), aff'd sub nom. Tall v. P'ship Dev. Grp., Inc., 669 Fed App'x 679, 2016 WL 6123507 (4th Cir. Oct. 20,…

lock 1 Citing casekeyboard_arrow_right

No. 16-1532

10-20-2016

HESMAN TALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC., (PDG); PDG REHABILITATIVE SERVICES; RISE PROGRAM; MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; MARYLAND DIVISION OF REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees.

Hesman Tall, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew David Gimovsky, WALKER, MURPHY & NELSON, LLP, Rockville, Maryland; Elliott L. Schoen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:15-cv-03352-RDB) Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hesman Tall, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew David Gimovsky, WALKER, MURPHY & NELSON, LLP, Rockville, Maryland; Elliott L. Schoen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Hesman Tall appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action alleging claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Maryland law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tall v. The P'ship Dev. Grp. Inc., No. 1:15-cv-03352-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED