From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 11, 2016
2015-2056 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2016)

Opinion

2015-2056

10-11-2016

SYNOPSYS, INC., Appellant v. MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, Appellee

ERIC SHUMSKY, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JEREMY PETERMAN; TRAVIS JENSEN, ANTHONY TARTAGLIO, Menlo Park, CA; BRIAN PHILIP GOLDMAN, San Francisco, CA. ANDREW M. MASON, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR, argued for appellee. Also represented by JEFFREY S. LOVE, JOHN D. VANDENBERG.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-00287.

JUDGMENT

ERIC SHUMSKY, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JEREMY PETERMAN; TRAVIS JENSEN, ANTHONY TARTAGLIO, Menlo Park, CA; BRIAN PHILIP GOLDMAN, San Francisco, CA. ANDREW M. MASON, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR, argued for appellee. Also represented by JEFFREY S. LOVE, JOHN D. VANDENBERG. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and DYK, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 11, 2016

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 11, 2016
2015-2056 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2016)
Case details for

Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SYNOPSYS, INC., Appellant v. MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 11, 2016

Citations

2015-2056 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2016)