Superior Derrick Servs., LLC
v.
B & M Indus., LLC

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUITMar 9, 2016
Docket Number: 16 00001-CW (La. Ct. App. Mar. 9, 2016)

Docket Number: 16 00001-CW

03-09-2016

SUPERIOR DERRICK SERVICES, LLC v. B & M INDUSTRIES, LLC, ET AL.

Philip E. Roberts Ungarino & Eckert, LLC 600 Jefferson Street, Ste 850 Lafayette LA 70501 Matthew John Ungarino Ungarino & Eckert, LLC 3850 N. Causeway Blvd., #1280 Metairie LA 70002 Wayne Robert Maldonado Ungarino & Eckert, LLC 3850 N. Causeway Blvd. #1280 Metairie LA 70002 Brian David Smith Ungarino & Eckert, L.L.C. 910 Pierremont Rd, Ste 103 Shreveport LA 71106 William H. Eckert Ungarino & Eckert, LLC 600 Jefferson Street, Ste 850 Lafayette LA 70501 Jason Michael Nash Ungarino & Eckert, LLC 910 Pierremont, Ste 103 Shreveport LA 71106 cc: David Oliver Way, Counsel for the Respondent Henry Camille Perret, Jr., Counsel for the Respondent Jared O. Brinlee, Counsel for the Respondent Jude C. David, Counsel for the Respondent Steven T. Ramos, Counsel for the Respondent Joseph C. Giglio, Jr., Counsel for the Respondent


NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

Philip E. Roberts
Ungarino & Eckert, LLC
600 Jefferson Street, Ste 850
Lafayette LA 70501 Matthew John Ungarino
Ungarino & Eckert, LLC
3850 N. Causeway Blvd., #1280
Metairie LA 70002 Wayne Robert Maldonado
Ungarino & Eckert, LLC
3850 N. Causeway Blvd. #1280
Metairie LA 70002 Brian David Smith
Ungarino & Eckert, L.L.C.
910 Pierremont Rd, Ste 103
Shreveport LA 71106 William H. Eckert
Ungarino & Eckert, LLC
600 Jefferson Street, Ste 850
Lafayette LA 70501 Jason Michael Nash
Ungarino & Eckert, LLC
910 Pierremont, Ste 103
Shreveport LA 71106

Writ Application from St. Martin Parish Case No. 81117-A

BEFORE JUDGES: Hon. Elizabeth A. Pickett Hon. Shannon J. Gremillion Hon. Phyllis M. Keaty As counsel of record in the captioned case, you are hereby notified that the ruling on the application for rehearing filed by Motion Industries, Inc. and Genuine Parts Company is:

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION GRANTED.
WRIT DENIED
.
The time periods set by the trial court for the Relators to respond to the subject discovery have expired. The request for a stay of the ruling was denied by the trial court, and the writ application filed with this court did not pray for expedited consideration. See Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule 4-4(B). Therefore, we deny the instant writ application as moot.

cc:


David Oliver Way, Counsel for the Respondent


Henry Camille Perret, Jr., Counsel for the Respondent


Jared O. Brinlee, Counsel for the Respondent


Jude C. David, Counsel for the Respondent


Steven T. Ramos, Counsel for the Respondent


Joseph C. Giglio, Jr., Counsel for the Respondent