Sturm
v.
TLC Vision (Usa) Corp.

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMAJan 8, 2013
Case No. CIV-12-1158-M (W.D. Okla. Jan. 8, 2013)

Case No. CIV-12-1158-M

01-08-2013

MARY JO'EL STURM, O.D., DAWN HOLSTED, O.D., JARED C. FREEMAN, O.D., STEPHANIE GOINS, AND STEPHANIE SOLES STROJNY, Plaintiffs, v. TLC VISION (USA) CORPORATION AND TLC HOLDINGS, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Temporary and Permanent Injunction filed in Oklahoma County District Court on October 19, 2012. This case was transferred to this Court on October 22, 2012. Prior to the filing of this case defendants filed an action in the United States District Court Eastern District of Missouri Eastern Division Case No. 4:12-cv-01855-ERW seeking temporary, preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining plaintiffs in this case from certain activities which defendants TLC Vision (USA) Corporation and TLC Holdings, Inc. allege violate the same employment agreements at issue in the instant case. On October 24, 2012, the Missouri Court granted TLC's motion for a temporary restraining order as to 4 of the 5 plaintiffs as well as all other persons involved finding Missouri Law governs. The Missouri Court also set a preliminary injunction hearing.

Upon consideration of the parties submissions the Court finds the Missouri Court was first to obtain jurisdiction of the parties and issues herein and should be allowed to decide issues before this Court. See O'Hare International Bank v. Lambert, 459 F.2d 328 (10th Cir. 1972) See also Hospah Coal Co. v. Chaco Energy Co., 673 F.2d 1161, 1163 (10th Cir. 1982). Additionally, the Court finds that the prosecution of two cases between the same parties involving the same issues would be a waste of time and judicial resources and would leave the parties subject to differing decisions.

The Court, therefore, finds Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Temporary and Permanent Injunction [docket no. 1-2] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of January, 2013.

___________


VICKI MILES-LaGRANGE


CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE