From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stowers v. Mahon

U.S.
Oct 4, 1976
429 U.S. 834 (1976)

Summary

dismissing petitioners' constitutional challenges to the Regional Rail Reorganization Act because the 1976 amendments gave the Special Court jurisdiction over such claims, but retaining jurisdiction over petitioners' contentions that certain ICC regulations were invalid under the Act

Summary of this case from Edison Elec. Institute v. I.C.C

Opinion

No. 75-1876.

October 4, 1976, OCTOBER TERM, 1976.


C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 526 F. 2d 1238.


Summaries of

Stowers v. Mahon

U.S.
Oct 4, 1976
429 U.S. 834 (1976)

dismissing petitioners' constitutional challenges to the Regional Rail Reorganization Act because the 1976 amendments gave the Special Court jurisdiction over such claims, but retaining jurisdiction over petitioners' contentions that certain ICC regulations were invalid under the Act

Summary of this case from Edison Elec. Institute v. I.C.C

prehearing statements of employees and union representatives are exempt from FOIA disclosure to extent such disclosure would interfere with Board enforcement proceedings

Summary of this case from In re Irving
Case details for

Stowers v. Mahon

Case Details

Full title:STOWERS ET AL. v. MAHON ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 4, 1976

Citations

429 U.S. 834 (1976)

Citing Cases

United States v. Scruggs

“[T]he requirement of value is satisfied if the thing has sufficient value in the mind of the person…

Trustees of Boston University v. N.L.R.B

The Board argues, and the district court found, that the information which is sought comes within Exemption…