From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stokes v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Aug 2, 2011
Civil No. 3:09-1264-PK (D. Or. Aug. 2, 2011)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:09-1264-PK.

August 2, 2011


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Papak has issued a Findings and Recommendation [31] in this action. The Magistrate Judge recommends granting plaintiff's request for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) in the amount of $9,770.09. No objections were filed by either party, and the case was referred to this court.

The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate. Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 501 F.2d 196, 206 (9th Cir. 1974).

No clear error appears on the face of the record. Accordingly, this court adopts the Findings and Recommendation in its entirety.

Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees [27] is granted in part. Counsel is entitled to a § 406(b) award of $9,770.09, which represents twenty-five percent of plaintiff's retroactive benefits minus $505.50 for counsel's delays in this matter. Plaintiff's counsel's previous fee award pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in the amount of $6,193.09 must be deducted from the § 406(b) fee award. Therefore, counsel's final fee award out of plaintiff's retroactive benefits is $3,577.00.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 1st day of August, 2011.


Summaries of

Stokes v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Aug 2, 2011
Civil No. 3:09-1264-PK (D. Or. Aug. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Stokes v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DAWN MARIE STOKES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Aug 2, 2011

Citations

Civil No. 3:09-1264-PK (D. Or. Aug. 2, 2011)