STMicroelectronics, Inc.v.Invensense, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIAJan 2, 2013
Case No. CV 12-CV-2475 JSW (N.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2013)

Case No. CV 12-CV-2475 JSW

01-02-2013

STMICROELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. INVENSENSE, INC., Defendant.

RACHEL KREVANS (CA SBN 116421) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP RUDY Y. KIM (CA SBN 199426) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Attorneys for Defendant INVENSENSE, INC.


RACHEL KREVANS (CA SBN 116421)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
RUDY Y. KIM (CA SBN 199426)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
INVENSENSE, INC.


STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO

EXTEND TIME TO EXCHANGE

PROPOSED TERMS FOR

CONSTRUCTION

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff STMicroelectronics, Inc., ("ST") and Defendant InvenSense, Inc., ("InvenSense") (collectively, "Parties"), through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and request an order extending the due date for the Parties' Patent L.R. 4-1 Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction from December 17, 2012 to December 21, 2012. This extension of time will provide the Parties the time necessary to prepare and complete the Proposed Terms for Construction. The requested time modification would change no other due dates and would have no effect on the remaining schedule for the case. Accordingly, ST and InvenSense hereby stipulate through their respective counsel of record as follows:

WHEREAS, on or about May 24, 2012, the Parties stipulated to an extension of time for InvenSense to respond to the Complaint; and

WHEREAS, on or about July 27, 2012, the Parties stipulated to an extension of time for ST to respond to the InvenSense's Counterclaims; and

WHEREAS, on or about July 31, 2012, the Court ordered a continuance of the Case Management Conference; and

WHEREAS, on or about October 12, 2012, the Court granted an order to shorten time for hearing; and

WHEREAS, on or about October 22, 2012, the Court ordered an extension of time to respond to the Parties' L.R. 3-2 Document Productions Accompanying Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions; and

WHEREAS, on or about December 4, 2012, the Court ordered an extension of time to respond to the Parties' L.R. 3-4 Document Productions Accompanying Disclosure of Invalidity Contentions and Patent L.R. 3-3 Invalidity Contentions; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's Case Management Order entered September 14, 2012, and pursuant to the Patent Local Rules, the current due date for the Parties' Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction is December 17, 2012; and

WHEREAS, the Parties require additional time to prepare their Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction, and ST and InvenSense, through their respective counsel of record, have agreed to extend the due date for the Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction from December 17, 2012 to December 21, 2012;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties hereto that the Parties shall have to and including December 21, 2012, to exchange their Proposed Terms for Construction.

RACHEL KREVANS


RUDY Y. KIM


MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP


By: _____


RUDY Y. KIM


Attorneys for Defendant


INVENSENSE, INC.


CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN


SEAN PAK


MICHELLE A. CLARK


LANCE YANG


MICHAEL POWELL


SUONG T. NGUYEN


THOMAS D. PEASE


CARLOS A. RODRIGUEZ


QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &


SULLIVAN, LLP


By: __________


MICHAEL POWELL


Attorneys for Plaintiff


STMICROELECTRONICS, INC.


ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE

I, Rudy Y. Kim, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION TO EXCHANGE PROPOSED TERMS FOR CONSTRUCTION. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Michael Powell has concurred in this filing.

By: _____


RUDY Y. KIM


PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________


The Honorable Jeffrey S. White


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE