Sterling
v.
Washoe County School District

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
United States District Court, D. NevadaAug 20, 2007
Case No. 3:07-cv-00245. (D. Nev. Aug. 20, 2007)

Case No. 3:07-cv-00245.

August 20, 2007

Robert Kilby, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 7402, Reno, NV, Attorney for Plaintiffs.

MAUPIN, COX LEGOY, PAUL J. ANDERSON, Attorney for Defendants.


STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS DUGAN AND CHRISTIANSEN (FIRST REQUEST)


Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Local Rule 6-2 and Local Rule 7-1, Robert Kilby, Esq. attorney for Plaintiffs, and Paul J. Anderson, Esq., attorney for Defendants, hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiffs shall have up to and including September 7, 2007, to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Defendants Dugan and Christainsen, filed August 1, 2007.

Good cause exists for entering into this stipulation and entering said Order. Plaintiff's counsel is very busy at this time and has vacation plans scheduled with out-of-state family during the applicable time frame. The additional time will allow Plaintiff adequate time to respond. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request this Court allow an extension up to and including September 7, 2007.

This is the first request for an extension and is not for purposes of undue delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.