From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stegall v. Stegall

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Sep 29, 2017
Appellate Case No. 2016-001702 (S.C. Ct. App. Sep. 29, 2017)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2016-001702 Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-360

09-29-2017

Phillip Joseph Stegall, Appellant, v. Jessica Lynn Stegall, Respondent.

Melinda Inman Butler, of The Butler Law Firm, of Union, for Appellant. Andrew Richard Havran, of Greer, for Respondent. Robert A. Clark, of Robert A. Clark, Attorney at Law, of Greenville, as Guardian ad Litem for the minor child.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Greenville County
Alex Kinlaw, Jr., Family Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Melinda Inman Butler, of The Butler Law Firm, of Union, for Appellant. Andrew Richard Havran, of Greer, for Respondent. Robert A. Clark, of Robert A. Clark, Attorney at Law, of Greenville, as Guardian ad Litem for the minor child. PER CURIAM : Phillip Joseph Stegall appeals the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2016). After a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Stegall's counsel. AFFIRMED. WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------


Summaries of

Stegall v. Stegall

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Sep 29, 2017
Appellate Case No. 2016-001702 (S.C. Ct. App. Sep. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Stegall v. Stegall

Case Details

Full title:Phillip Joseph Stegall, Appellant, v. Jessica Lynn Stegall, Respondent.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 29, 2017

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2016-001702 (S.C. Ct. App. Sep. 29, 2017)