From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stefano v. City of Long Beach

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 23, 2015
621 F. App'x 404 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 13-56156

10-23-2015

DEBRA STEFANO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF LONG BEACH; et al., Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-06202-DSF-JC MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California
Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding
Before: SILVERMAN, BERZON, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Debra Stefano appeals pro se from the district court's judgment in accordance with the terms of a settlement agreement in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a decision to enforce a settlement agreement. Kirkland v. Legion Ins. Co., 343 F.3d 1135, 1140 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Stefano's motion to set aside the settlement agreement because Stefano failed to establish grounds for invalidating the agreement. See Ahern v. Cent. Pac. Freight Lines, 846 F.2d 47, 48 (9th Cir. 1988) (district court's finding that a party consented to a settlement and intended to be bound by it must be affirmed unless clearly erroneous); see also Cal. Civ. Code § 1569 (elements of duress).

Denial of Stefano's motion to disqualify her former counsel from continuing to represent the other plaintiffs was proper. See Cohn v. Rosenfeld, 733 F.2d 625, 631 (9th Cir. 1984) (this court "will not disturb a district court's ruling on a motion to disqualify counsel if the record reveals any sound basis for the court's action" (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Paul E. Iacano Structural Eng'r, Inc. v. Humphrey, 722 F.2d 435, 438 (9th Cir. 1983) (setting forth standard of review).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Stefano v. City of Long Beach

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 23, 2015
621 F. App'x 404 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Stefano v. City of Long Beach

Case Details

Full title:DEBRA STEFANO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF LONG BEACH; et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 23, 2015

Citations

621 F. App'x 404 (9th Cir. 2015)