Steel
v.
Sacramento County

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
United States District Court, E.D. CaliforniaSep 13, 2010
No. CIV S-07-2528 LKK EFB PS. (E.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2010)

No. CIV S-07-2528 LKK EFB PS.

September 13, 2010


ORDER


This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, was referred to the undersigned by Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On December 3, 2007, the undersigned issued an order dismissing plaintiff's complaint and granting plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. Dckt. No. 7. Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the December 3, 2007 order; therefore, on January 10, 2008, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations which recommended that the action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Dckt. No. 12. On February 26, 2008, the assigned district judge adopted that recommendation, dismissed the action, closed the case, and entered judgment accordingly. Dckt. Nos. 14, 15.

Notwithstanding that judgment, on September 8, 2010, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address, and a letter to the court. Dckt. Nos. 16, 17. Plaintiff's recent filings do not constitute proper requests for reconsideration or appeal of the February 26, 2008 order or judgment. Therefore, the documents will be disregarded. Plaintiff is advised that the court will disregard and issue no response to any future filings in this closed case.

Accordingly, good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

1. Plaintiff's September 8, 2010 filings, Dckt. Nos. 16 and 17, are disregarded; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on plaintiff at the current address provided by plaintiff on September 8, 2010.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 13, 2010.