From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Villano

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 20, 1929
146 A. 917 (N.J. 1929)

Opinion

Submitted October 26, 1928 —

Decided May 20, 1929.

On error to the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 6 N.J. Mis. R. 713.

For the defendant in error, Joseph L. Smith.

For the plaintiff in error, Harold Simandl.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Villano

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 20, 1929
146 A. 917 (N.J. 1929)
Case details for

State v. Villano

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. GEORGE VILLANO, PLAINTIFF IN…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 20, 1929

Citations

146 A. 917 (N.J. 1929)
146 A. 917

Citing Cases

Thompson v. State

); State v. Tobin, 31 Wyo. 355 ; 14 Cent. Dig. Crim. Law, Sec. 2099 and cases cited; Lee v. State, 132 N.E.…

State v. Steensen

However, the same limitation applies as to the type proof receivable, namely, that it must be adapted to the…