Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
Supreme Court of MinnesotaDec 19, 1980
300 N.W.2d 4 (Minn. 1980)

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • State v. Scott

    …1. There is no merit to defendant's contention that the trial court erred in admitting the other-crime…

lock 1 Citing casekeyboard_arrow_right

No. 50699.

December 19, 1980.

Appeal from the District Court, Hennepin County, Douglas K. Amdahl, J.

C. Paul Jones, Public Defender, and Phebe Haugen, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Thomas L. Johnson, County Atty., Vernon E. Bergstrom, Chief, Appellate Section, David W. Larson, and Thomas A. Weist, Asst. County Attys., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree, Minn. Stat. § 609.342(e)(i) (1978) (actor uses force or coercion to accomplish sexual penetration and causes personal injury to complainant), and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum prison term of 20 years. On this appeal from judgment of conviction defendant contends that his conviction should be reversed outright, because the evidence of penetration was legally insufficient, or that at least he should receive a new trial because the trial court improperly admitted other-crime evidence. There is no merit to either contention. The evidence of defendant's guilt consisted of positive testimony by the witness, as well as strong corroborative evidence, which included the properly admitted testimony about a strikingly similar act of criminal sexual misconduct committed by defendant on another woman under similar circumstances a few months earlier. We affirm.


AMDAHL, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.