From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Candia

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two
Jul 26, 2005
128 Wn. App. 1053 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005)

Summary

In Candia, some of the testimony was helpful to defendant, as the Court of Appeals conceded, stating that Dr. Stirling's testimony that it was unlikely the defendant could actually penetrate C.M.D. was "favorable to Candia."

Summary of this case from State v. Kirkman

Opinion

No. 31690-1-II.

July 26, 2005.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 03-1-02005-1, Robert L. Harris, J., entered April 16, 2004.


Reversed by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Morgan, J.; Quinn-Brintnall, C.J., dissenting.


Summaries of

State v. Candia

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two
Jul 26, 2005
128 Wn. App. 1053 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005)

In Candia, some of the testimony was helpful to defendant, as the Court of Appeals conceded, stating that Dr. Stirling's testimony that it was unlikely the defendant could actually penetrate C.M.D. was "favorable to Candia."

Summary of this case from State v. Kirkman
Case details for

State v. Candia

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. RUBEN JUAREZ CANDIA, Appellant

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two

Date published: Jul 26, 2005

Citations

128 Wn. App. 1053 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005)
128 Wash. App. 1053

Citing Cases

State v. Warren

This case does not involve similar testimony, and we address Kirkman's analysis only as it relates to the…

State v. Kirkman

¶15 Relying upon its decision in Kirkman, a divided panel of the Court of Appeals (Quinn-Brintnall, C.J.,…