From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Berberian

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Feb 27, 1974
315 A.2d 743 (R.I. 1974)

Summary

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Panadero v. State

Opinion

February 27, 1974.

PRESENT: Paolino, Joslin, Kelleher and Doris, JJ.

1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS. Ordinances. Judicial Notice. Municipal ordinances are not within the purview of the doctrine of judicial notice.

2. CRIMINAL LAW. Statutes Lacking Penalties. Conviction for violation of a statute containing no penalty cannot stand.

CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS charging violation of traffic regulations, before Supreme Court on appeal following affirmation by Gallant, J. of Superior Court of finding of guilty by Municipal Court, heard and all five complaints remitted to Superior Court with direction to dismiss.

Richard J. Israel, Attorney General, Donald P. Ryan, Asst. Attorney General, Edward E. Dillon, Jr., Special Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff.

Berberian Tanenbaum, Aram K. Berberian, pro se, for defendant.


These are five criminal complaints charging that the defendant has allowed an automobile registered to him to be parked in violation of certain traffic regulations of the city of Providence. Originally, trial was held in the Providence Municipal Court. There, the judge found the defendant guilty and imposed a fine of $50 and costs on each complaint. An appeal was taken to the Superior Court where a justice of the Superior Court affirmed the decision of the Municipal Court. In his appeal to us, the defendant raises a variety of issues. One of them is dispositive.

[1, 2] It is black-letter law that a conviction for a statute containing no penalty cannot stand. Every criminal statute must provide a penalty. The General Assembly has authorized the city of Providence to establish a schedule of fines for violations of parking regulations. Public Laws 1956, ch. 3807. There is no evidence in the record to show that such a schedule has been established and what fines, if any, were to be imposed for the alleged infractions. Municipal ordinances are not within the purview of the doctrine of judicial notice. We must therefore in accordance with the holding of State v. Tessier, 100 R.I. 210, 213 A.2d 699 (1965), remit all five cases to the Superior Court with direction to dismiss the complaints.

Mr. Chief Justice Roberts did not participate.


Summaries of

State v. Berberian

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Feb 27, 1974
315 A.2d 743 (R.I. 1974)

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Panadero v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Lynch v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Caterino v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Aguilar v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Ortiz v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Carpenter v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Gonder v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Merida v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Morris v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Buchanan v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Silva v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from McKay v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Jensen v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Guzman v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Feliciano v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Esposito v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Burgos v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Rushlow v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Perry v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Cole v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Thibodeau v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Mattatall v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Powell v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from DeCiantis v. State

dismissing a defendant's conviction when the city never established a schedule of fines for parking violations

Summary of this case from Depina v. State
Case details for

State v. Berberian

Case Details

Full title:STATE vs. ARAM K. BERBERIAN

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Feb 27, 1974

Citations

315 A.2d 743 (R.I. 1974)
315 A.2d 743

Citing Cases

Murray v. State

To that end, our Supreme Court has made it clear that if a statute does not provide a penalty, a conviction…

Mattatall v. State

To that end, our Supreme Court has made it clear that if a statute does not provide a penalty, a conviction…