From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sprinkle v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Jan 9, 2012
No. C 11-5787 RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)

Opinion

No. C 11-5787 RS (PR)

01-09-2012

MARK SPRINKLE, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This is a federal civil rights action filed by a pro se state prisoner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order of the Court, plaintiff was granted 30 days (1) to file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"), or (2) to pay the filing fee of $350.00, or face dismissal of the action. More than 30 days have passed since the order was filed, and plaintiff has not filed an IFP application or paid the filing fee. Plaintiff also has failed to comply with an order to submit a complaint within 30 days. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice as to plaintiff filing (1) a complaint, and (2) a complete IFP application or paying the filing fee. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sprinkle v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Jan 9, 2012
No. C 11-5787 RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Sprinkle v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:MARK SPRINKLE, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 9, 2012

Citations

No. C 11-5787 RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2012)