From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sporty's Farm v. Sportsman's Market, Inc.

U.S.
Jun 26, 2000
530 U.S. 1262 (2000)

Summary

holding that the ACPA presents no retroactivity problem because cybersquatting is a continuing wrong

Summary of this case from Minarik Electric Company v. Electro Sales Co., Inc.

Opinion

No. 99-1752.

June 26, 2000, OCTOBER TERM, 1999.


C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 202 F. 3d 489.


Summaries of

Sporty's Farm v. Sportsman's Market, Inc.

U.S.
Jun 26, 2000
530 U.S. 1262 (2000)

holding that the ACPA presents no retroactivity problem because cybersquatting is a continuing wrong

Summary of this case from Minarik Electric Company v. Electro Sales Co., Inc.

recognizing implicitly that a mental and physical fitness-for-duty examination fell within the ADA's protections and that “an employer's discretion to order employees to undergo examinations is hardly unbounded”

Summary of this case from Kroll v. White Lake Ambulance Auth.
Case details for

Sporty's Farm v. Sportsman's Market, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SPORTY'S FARM, L. L. C. v. SPORTSMAN'S MARKET, INC

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 26, 2000

Citations

530 U.S. 1262 (2000)

Citing Cases

Gallagher v. Spell

When a § 1983 plaintiff does not specify in the complaint whether the defendant is named in their official or…

Young v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

When they fail to do so, "by operation of law, defendants are deemed sued in their official capacities."…