holding that the ACPA presents no retroactivity problem because cybersquatting is a continuing wrong
Summary of this case from Minarik Electric Company v. Electro Sales Co., Inc.No. 99-1752.
June 26, 2000, OCTOBER TERM, 1999.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 202 F. 3d 489.
holding that the ACPA presents no retroactivity problem because cybersquatting is a continuing wrong
Summary of this case from Minarik Electric Company v. Electro Sales Co., Inc.recognizing implicitly that a mental and physical fitness-for-duty examination fell within the ADA's protections and that “an employer's discretion to order employees to undergo examinations is hardly unbounded”
Summary of this case from Kroll v. White Lake Ambulance Auth.Full title:SPORTY'S FARM, L. L. C. v. SPORTSMAN'S MARKET, INC
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 26, 2000
When a § 1983 plaintiff does not specify in the complaint whether the defendant is named in their official or…
Young v. U.S. Department of AgricultureWhen they fail to do so, "by operation of law, defendants are deemed sued in their official capacities."…