Summary
affirming for the reasons stated by the district court
Summary of this case from Frank v. SchultzOpinion
No. 96-36110.
April 6, 1998.
Appeal from the D.Idaho.
Affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Sparks v. Transamerica Ins. Co.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 6, 1998
141 F.3d 1179 (9th Cir. 1998)
Summaries of
Sparks v. Transamerica Ins. Co.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 6, 1998
141 F.3d 1179 (9th Cir. 1998)
affirming for the reasons stated by the district court
Summary of this case from Frank v. Schultzrecognizing that a federal slayer law exists within federal common law and applies to ERISA cases
Summary of this case from Herinckx v. SanelleCase details for
Sparks v. Transamerica Ins. Co.
Case Details
Full title:Sparks v. Transamerica Ins. Co
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Date published: Apr 6, 1998
Citations
141 F.3d 1179 (9th Cir. 1998)
Citing Cases
Monteer v. ABL Mgmt.
e to a different religion by handing him a Christmas card or providing a special meal on a federal holiday.…
Wilhite v. LittlelightRather than strictly construing the scope of FTCA's waiver of sovereign immunity, such a construction would…